Former EPA Employee Once Again Blasts Scott Pruitt for Failure of Leadership

Blasting Scott Pruitt's leadership to protect human health and the environment

“To protect human health and the environment”

The following open letter from former EPA employee Michael Cox. After 25 years with the agency, Cox retired last March. Upon his departure from EPA Cox wrote a withering letter to newly appointed EPA chief Scott Pruitt.

Among his many criticisms, Cox zeroed in on Pruitt’s confounding statements on EPA’s mission, his outright climate denial of change, and the plummeting morale of career workers forced to witness the dismantling of their life’s work,  writing:

“I have worked under six administrations with political appointees leading EPA from both parties. This is the first time I remember staff openly dismissing and mocking the environmental policies of an administration and by extension you, the individual selected to implement the policies.”

A company man

Pruitt came to the EPA by way of his election as Attorney General for Oklahoma. Earlier this year I had an opportunity to speak with Johnson Bridgewater, president of the Oklahoma chapter of the Sierra Club. Bridgewater saw firsthand Pruitt’s brazen disregard for environmental safeguards.

While AG for Oklahoma, Pruitt oversaw the dismantling of a years-long effort by the state to get large poultry operations next door in Arkansas to stop polluting “the entire watershed of eastern Oklahoma.” His 2010 election as AG was funded in large measure by the very same poultry interests in Arkansas.

Harold Hamm, the self-avowed “oil champion,” managed his 2014 re-election campaign. As AG, Pruitt sued EPA 14 times.

A thinly veiled pretense of leadership

Pruitt says he believes the scientific consensus on climate change still has too many “unanswered questions.” Yet he supports eliminating climate research to find those answers. In any case, he doesn’t think CO2 is a primary driver of climate change.

He wants to “give back power to the states” to administer environmental programs. That will be difficult, given how the Trump administration’s proposed budget slashes funding to states for those programs.

At every turn, Pruitt shows little interest in leading his agency or learning from his staff. His thinly veiled pretense of leadership appears more as a cover for his corporate and political bosses.

Speaking out against Pruitt

On the eve of Donald Trump’s anticipated announcement of whether he intends on keeping the U.S. in the Paris Agreement, Cox wrote a follow-up letter to Pruitt. Whatever hopes he may have had last March that things could improve under Pruitt now appear all but dashed.

“I was hopeful you would make some adjustments to better engage EPA career staff and to push back on the Administration’s efforts to dramatically cut EPA’s budget and reduce staff to levels not seen for over 30 years,” wrote Cox.

“Unfortunately, based on the President’s most recent EPA budget, my conversations with EPA staff, and some of your recent decisions, I am even more concerned than in late March about the direction of EPA under your leadership.”

An EPA insider forwarded to us Cox’s letter. Read the full text here.

Thomas Schueneman
Thomas Schueneman
Tom is the founder and managing editor of and the PlanetWatch Group. His work appears in Triple Pundit, Slate, Cleantechnia, Planetsave, Earth911, and several other sustainability-focused publications. Tom is a member of the Society of Environmental Journalists.

Get in Touch


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Related Articles

Get in Touch


Latest Posts